One last remark (sorry): Why did the leading personnel of the PP thought that a deeply dark-brown backdrop would indicate that they would be working toward a brighter future for Thailand? Why didn't they try to convey a spirit of optimism, choosing an utterly oppressive color instead?
P.S.: This composition communicates that the People's Party's leadership gives a damn about female voters. This level of disrespect is utterly astonishing.
Seeing the composition of the People's Party's governing team, what really struck me was that this team is almost entirely male. Does the "People" in "People's Party" mainly refer to the male part of the "people"? Or why is it that a political party that is supposedly center-left and progressive displays such an utter disregard for the female part of the "people"? If I were a woman voter in Thailand, I would feel utterly insulted.
One last remark (sorry): Why did the leading personnel of the PP thought that a deeply dark-brown backdrop would indicate that they would be working toward a brighter future for Thailand? Why didn't they try to convey a spirit of optimism, choosing an utterly oppressive color instead?
I've been wondering the same thing!
Threatening dark times if they get a chance of governing the country. Very clever. -:)
P.S.: This composition communicates that the People's Party's leadership gives a damn about female voters. This level of disrespect is utterly astonishing.
Seeing the composition of the People's Party's governing team, what really struck me was that this team is almost entirely male. Does the "People" in "People's Party" mainly refer to the male part of the "people"? Or why is it that a political party that is supposedly center-left and progressive displays such an utter disregard for the female part of the "people"? If I were a woman voter in Thailand, I would feel utterly insulted.